Some observations on FlashFire09d:
1) The status bar shows the amount of the buffer is used. Very informative.
2) During ATTO test, 3 to 4 bars appear. This would shows intensive write to SSD will use 75-100% of the buffer.
3) During internet browsing, one bar or none appears. This shows that very little write to SSD is required because I use RamDisk technique for the browser temp files.
4) ATTO test shows this 09d version is slightly slower (say 2-4%?) than the 09c version. But there is practically no difference in actual usage.
5) Apparently the older 09c requires less computing resource. So I would still keep the 09c version for my HP mini 1030 and only use the newer 09d version for my Toshiba M70.
