FlashFire XP 32Bit (0.9f) - Another developing version

[Slapo]

Good news - I had no forced check disks on startup with Avira and I've installed Avast again yesterday, but this time I've changed the logging settings and it seems all is good again

[richard.van.dok@tuus.nl]

Hi all, I experienced some CHKDSK's as well after installing FF 0.9f. Turned out a file used by Skype had gotten corrupt, CHKDSK crashed when trying to correct this situation.
I could solve this using Hiren's 10 booted from an USB stick.
It's a little hard to notice the error CHKDSK generates as shortly after the system reboots.

[Ramon]

Good news - I had no forced check disks on startup with Avira and I've installed Avast again yesterday, but this time I've changed the logging settings and it seems all is good again

Hi Slapo,

I have uninstalled nod32 and installed Avira in order to check if the antivirus is the problem. Anyway, it has no email scan option.
Could you tell us the logging settings you changed to Avast, so if I check that everyting is fine with Avira I will try to move to Avast (that does provide email scan option).

Regards

[Slapo]

Ramon,

I've set the logging level to 'Error'. So far, I had no forced check disk at boot.
I hope this helps.

[Ramon]

Ramon,

I've set the logging level to 'Error'. So far, I had no forced check disk at boot.
I hope this helps.

Slapo.

Thanks.

Since I installed Avira, no more chkdks have occurred.
I will try to move to avast for the mail filter.

Let's hope that finally the antivirus was the cause of the chkdsk .

Regards

[Ramon]

Hi again,

FYI, I have installed avast, but I had scandisk every restart.

I have returned to avira and until now I have not had any scandisk.

I will keep avira some more days to see what happens.

Regards

[Ramon]

Hi once again,

I have been with avira antivirus for 3 days, and no more scandisk at startup have appeared with version 0.9f, even with TuneXP tweaks applied.

I am very very happy .

So I think that flashfire has (may have) some problem with some antivirus (like nod32 and avast) probably together with some hardware configuration that makes believe windows at shutdown that the ssd disk may be corrupted (and thus makes the sytem/windows to activate the dirty bit).

Regards,

[bb53]

hi,

in my point of view there is no trouble with ff 0.9f and nod v4

regards,

bb

[menot]

Windows XP SP3, traditional HDD.

- 0.99: Registry corruption after reboot, and performance degradation during large writes.
- 0.9f with "No" to netbook question: No registry corruption, performance increase for small writes, occasional hiccups but overall speed is faster.

[scheichs]

- 0.99: Registry corruption after reboot, and performance degradation during large writes.
- 0.9f with "No" to netbook question: No registry corruption, performance increase for small writes, occasional hiccups but overall speed is faster.

I had same experiences with my netbook. Additionally "Standby" with 0.9f seems to be more reliable.